RETURN
edited 8/19/11
It is important that you distinguish among different types of literature and not mix them indiscriminately through your review. The important distinctions are:
The chart below ranks them by epistemic strength, indicates common uses for their contents, mentions typical sources, and finally indicates disadvantages in using them for your dissertation.
Of course an item may fit in more than one category and consequently lose or gain epistemic strength.
Type of Literature |
|
|
|
(1) Theoretical meta-analysis. |
Broad review of theory Research Base |
AERJ
Jour Res Math Ed |
Difficult to incorporate |
(1) Empirical meta-review |
Broad review of results Research Base |
AERJ
Jour Res Math Ed |
Difficult to incorporate |
(2) Report of empirical research |
Review (and critique) of results Research Base |
Jour Res Math Ed
AERJ
|
Usually narrow in scope. Assessment and critique may be difficult. |
(2) Theoretical analysis |
Review and critique of theory
|
Ed Theory
Ed Studies |
Assessment and critique may be difficult. |
(3) Book with a substantial base of empirical references |
Broad review of results
Research Base, Justification |
Berliner & Biddle The Manufactured Crisis 1995 Addison-Wesley | Mixed contents. See above and below |
(3) Book with a substantial base of theoretical references |
Broad review of theory
Research Base, Justification |
J. Thompson Studies in the Theory of Ideology 1984 Berkeley | Mixed contents. See above and below |
(4) Policy report |
Indicator of concern
Indicator of organizational commitment Research Base, Justification |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics |
Recommendations are not results.
May be wishful thinking or special pleading. |
(5) Opinion article |
Indicator of concern Research Base, Justification |
Educational Leadership
Phi Delta Kappan School Boards Journal |
Recommendations are not results.
May be wishful thinking or special pleading. |
See also Organizing Your Literature Review